3 ms·
Apartheid seems to highlight a big difference here. Romans and Gauls could fuse into a single local culture, but Europeans were determined to keep Africans unde
by nathan_long 9y ago
Apartheid seems to highlight a big difference here. Romans and Gauls could fuse into a single local culture, but Europeans were determined to keep Africans under their thumbs. It's hard to imagine the locals being "better off" for more generations of oppression.
- akhatri_aus 9y agoActually in the "winds of change" speech, this was one thing the Europeans did not like - Harold Macmillan seeked equality much to the dismay of the government in South Africa - later that year they also turned to a republic. Also in the case of Rhodesia Ian Smith it was considered had committed treason with his UDI against the wishes in Whitehall.