3 ms·
Remember though that X-Gene wasn't very good when examined. And the current ThunderX is actually the continuation of the very interesting (and canceled by) Bro
by pinewurst 9y ago
Remember though that X-Gene wasn't very good when examined. And the current ThunderX is actually the continuation of the very interesting (and canceled by) Broadcom Vulcan, not the mediocre original.
- tonysdg 9y agoOh I'm well aware -- the lab I work in bought a couple of X-Gene 1s for testing, and even an X-Gene 2. They were complete and utter crap performance- and power-wise -- but they were (at the time) the only thing available. Didn't know that about the ThunderX -- fascinating! Thanks!
- rwmj 9y agoI wouldn't expect much from ThunderX(1). Qualcomm Amberwing or Cavium ThunderX2 are where it's at for Xeon-like performance.