I only skimmed the page but this one caught my eye: > This maneuvering and filibustering is soon likely to exhaust the patience of any reasonable person who na

I only skimmed the page but this one caught my eye: > This maneuvering and filibustering is soon likely to exhaust the patience of any reasonable person who naturally prefers not to reason with the unreasonable, and who, unlike the advocate, has no special interest or passion other than striving to maintain neutrality. Additionally, by continually engaging fringe advocates in endless argument, you run the risk of turning Wikipedia into a battleground or a debating society. At the present time, Wikipedia does not have an effective means to address superficially polite but tendentious, long-term, fringe advocacy. This is definitely a very, very hard problem.