3 ms·
I found Odersky's comments and concern less useful than Li Haoyi's. Li's focused on the unclear - and broken - abstractions, while Odersky's seemed to focus mor
by allengeorge 9y ago
I found Odersky's comments and concern less useful than Li Haoyi's. Li's focused on the unclear - and broken - abstractions, while Odersky's seemed to focus more on the misapplication of language features. Am I reading this incorrectly?
- danielbarla 9y agoI think that's probably a fair comment (from my admittedly somewhat limited understanding). That said, both do seem to share a drive for simplicity and clarity at their core, and Li Haoyi's post does have the advantage of another 6 years of insight / subsequent changes to SBT.