4 ms·
i do not think Wikipedia takes a stance on anything and tries to stay neutral but present the case for ideas on many fronts but is dependent on the writer as we
by klampah 9y ago
i do not think Wikipedia takes a stance on anything and tries to stay neutral but present the case for ideas on many fronts but is dependent on the writer as well.
- qubex 9y agoI think a stance needs to be taken on certain issues. For example, spelling and grammar are famously well within the domain of ignoramuses demanding that their mistakes and errors be taken as “valid alternatives”, but they cannot be. This kind of stuff, in my mind, should be the same.
- zdkl 9y ago1) You are always someone else's ignoramus 2) It's tough to draw the line on what is acceptable as "enforced opinion" and what isn't. I find the true-neutral alignment of wikipedia much more sound from a public service perspective. I mean they don' hide it, and don't claim to be 100% up to date or accurate.