3 ms·
As your quote points out: these are state-run businesses. I'm sceptical of the sate running ski resorts. But ignoring that for a second, it's not out of the ord
by matt4077 9y ago
As your quote points out: these are state-run businesses. I'm sceptical of the sate running ski resorts. But ignoring that for a second, it's not out of the ordinary to cover a loss that was the result from extraordinary events such as a warm winter.
Presumably, they didn't have to bail them out in other years, meaning they ran a profit in other years.
- lmm 9y agoThe state central government bailing out a state-run business is fine. Getting the state transport authority to bail out a business unrelated to transport seems obviously wrong.
- freeone3000 9y agoOkay, so instead the money should go into general fund, and the money from general fund should pay for the ski resort? I don't see a practical difference.
- lmm 9y agoIt makes it a lot clearer to voters what money is going where.