> That doesn't invalidate the idea that Mark Z's wealth and fame change his personal security risk profile compared to someone who is neither wealthy or famous

> That doesn't invalidate the idea that Mark Z's wealth and fame change his personal security risk profile compared to someone who is neither wealthy or famous. It certainly changes his profile. I'm not sure that this makes him at a higher risk of crime or makes him need a wall around him. > The injustice is that because of the societal wealth disparity, the poorer you are, the less security you can afford. And indeed there are many poor people who have a much higher risk of crime than this Zucker, whether they have a wall or not.