> Why not increase the pool like men do: go for more younger, possibly less educated men (as the article implies for men)? Because it takes women thousands of

> Why not increase the pool like men do: go for more younger, possibly less educated men (as the article implies for men)? Because it takes women thousands of times longer to produce a child than men. It's just game theory. Keep in mind also that the average woman doesn't have any magical ability to figure out which men will be successful in advance, otherwise all the top venture capitalists, producers, publishers, etc. would be women.