3 ms·

This is by far the deepest assessment of the situation and it totally makes sense to consider the user and the situation. In fact, building a matrix with criter

This is by far the deepest assessment of the situation and it totally makes sense to consider the user and the situation. In fact, building a matrix with criteria and user/situation will benefit the who process and everyone involved. Thank you very much! But, regardless of the kind of UI, user, situation etc almost everything here is subjective, what do you think could be done to avoid the subjective nature of this process?

TuringTest 9y ago
Sit at least four / five users[1] in front of the app and let them use it for a real exercise, asking them what they see (but without using leading questions that would give hints that a user will not get in real use). No matter how much you analyze and measure your design, there will be expressions that they understand with the wrong meaning, buttons they should use that they can't see, and ways to think about the app that you couldn't possibly have anticipated. So see what those problems are that you couldn't have find out in advance, fix them, and put them again in front of some more users to test whether they really solve the problem. 1. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-w...