7 ms·
The building (part of the Ruta-N complex) was designed by http://alejandroecheverri-valencia.co http://alejandroecheverri-valencia.co It was the first LEED Gol
by theoh 9y ago
The building (part of the Ruta-N complex) was designed by http://alejandroecheverri-valencia.co http://alejandroecheverri-valencia.co It was the first LEED Gold-certified public building in Columbia (in 2016) so it's cutting edge rather than typical.
It's worth noting that Alejandro Echeverri also teaches (edit: has taught) at Syracuse University.
It sounds like you experienced the lives of the privileged, mobile elite of Colombia. That's valid, as far as it goes, but any boosterism should be tempered with at least a mention of the countries massive inequality (sadly not that atypical for Latin America).
- crusso 9y ago"but any boosterism should be tempered" You say that as though boosterism has a negative effect on the non-mobile-elite of Columbia when I would think that any economic activity would be a boost for the whole economy there.
- coldtea 9y ago>You say that as though boosterism has a negative effect on the non-mobile-elite of Columbia when I would think that any economic activity would be a boost for the whole economy there. This is not always the case, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
- foldr 9y agoWealth inequality in Colombia is high, but actually lower than wealth inequality in the US by most measures. If someone posted about a positive experience at a tech conference in New York, I wouldn't expect to see a follow up reminding us about poor people in Tennessee.
- crdoconnor 9y agoIf somebody tried to make a sweeping generalized comment about the country as a whole based upon that one experience I would expect exactly that.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- greeneggs 9y ago> Wealth inequality in Colombia is high, but actually lower than wealth inequality in the US by most measures. Really? CIA Gini coefficients: US 47.0 (2014), Colombia 53.5 (2012) Ratio of the average income of the top 10% to the bottom 10%: US 18.5, Colombia 60.4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_eq... Granted, this is income not wealth inequality. And there are many ways of measuring it. I would like to know your source.
- foldr 9y agohttp://fortune.com/2015/09/30/america-wealth-inequality/ http://fortune.com/2015/09/30/america-wealth-inequality/ (the relevant list is at the end of the article) See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_distribution_of_wealth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_distribut... for wealth ginis. I'm sure there are lots of different measures that give lots of different results. My point was just that the US and Colombia aren't radically different in terms of economic inequality.
- jabretti 9y ago>My point was just that the US and Colombia aren't radically different in terms of economic inequality. What if you take into account the non-linear value of money, though? This seems to be missing in most accounts of inequality.
- afterburner 9y agoThe US is not a high bar for comparison of wealth inequality. In fact wealth in equality in the US is a problem, and by any measures Columbia is either about the same or much worse. The goal is places like Denmark. South America in general has serious inequality problems.
- kingkawn 9y agoThere should be that reminder here too
- volgo 9y ago> Wealth inequality in Colombia is high, but actually lower than wealth inequality in the US by most measures When everyone's at the bottom, there's little wealth inequality
- foldr 9y agoSure, but that's not the situation in Colombia. Colombia has a high level of wealth inequality.