I really disagree with the "random" part, though. Human openings need to at least have some "theory" around them to know what to do if your opponent diverges fr

I really disagree with the "random" part, though. Human openings need to at least have some "theory" around them to know what to do if your opponent diverges from the main lines. Usually "real evidence" that the human choices sometimes are better than the machine ones is that the engines after a long time agree with the human choices.