2 ms·
I am normally a FOSS guy, but I have to give credits to Photoshop. I dabbled in retro hardware lately and I am using an iBook running on OS 9 with Photoshop 5.0
by jimmies 9y ago
I am normally a FOSS guy, but I have to give credits to Photoshop. I dabbled in retro hardware lately and I am using an iBook running on OS 9 with Photoshop 5.0. It's unbelievably powerful and most everything you want a competent image editor is there. I can still edit my modern pictures with what is provided in the program and it's really quick too. Oh, and what's more... You can run an even earlier of Photopshop, I think as high as 4.0 or something on classic-classic Macs, which have freaking Motorola 68k processors. I think the only feature I miss is editoable text layers. It's pretty darn amazing - if you don't have one, try running the thing on the emulator - Basilisk II.
No wonder the original authors boasted it as "High Performance Mac software." It's pretty freaking fantastic.
- bluedino 9y agoIt's funny to hear people these days ask if the 12" MacBook can handle Photoshop or if the maxed out 15" MacBook Pro is needed. We used Photoshop in the old days on 300MHz G3's with 64MB to do all the production work we do now. Sure, image effects can be rendered in real-time instead of waiting 20 seconds, everything is faster, it doesn't take five minutes to load a hundred images... The editable text layers in 5.0 was the feature that I missed most whenever I had to go back to a machine with 4.0