4 ms·
This can make sense when you're doing batch requests and allow partial failures. Wouldn't that be a 206?
by rhizome 9y ago
This can make sense when you're doing batch requests and allow partial failures.
Wouldn't that be a 206?
- detaro 9y agoNo, 206 is only used with Range requests, when you try to get only some of the bytes of a larger resource. There is 207, I think created by WebDAV, where you give back an XML document detailing the status of sub-requests. I feel like that'd be confusing in many contexts as well, and a clearly defined custom response is probably easier to handle for the user.