3 ms·
> I remember correctly the combination of a Super GM and an engine is still markedly stronger than an engine alone. This may have been true when engines were s
by gamegoblin 9y ago
> I remember correctly the combination of a Super GM and an engine is still markedly stronger than an engine alone.
This may have been true when engines were still only marginally stronger than humans, but I haven't seen any evidence that is currently true. A few years ago Nakamura + Rybka (previous best program) lost to Stockfish.
- Recursing 9y agoAt the time Rybka was not one of the strongest engines anymore, and "correspondence chess" (human + computers) is still played. The strongest players are not GMs, as far as I know, and a very important part of those games is trying to force positions where the opponent's engine might make a slight mistake Here is an interview with the world champion https://en.chessbase.com/post/better-than-an-engine-leonardo-ljubicic-1-2 https://en.chessbase.com/post/better-than-an-engine-leonardo...
- thom 9y agoDo you know of any evidence that these players+engines can beat engines alone, instead of each other?