9 ms·
Sorry to go straight off-topic but if anyone from AMD is reading, please remove PSP from future and/or give us the ability to remove it from existing machines,
by hd4 9y ago
Sorry to go straight off-topic but if anyone from AMD is reading, please remove PSP from future and/or give us the ability to remove it from existing machines, this is a golden opportunity (with the Intel ME having been shown to be broken recently https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15656931 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15656931 ) you really shouldn't pass up.
- dvddgld 9y agoI assume that if this was on the cards at all they would've done it earlier. Let's keep our fingers crossed though, it could make a big difference in the direction of technology (and thus the world) from here on out.
- roblabla 9y agoThey already said they wouldn't open source it (after suggesting they might). I doubt they'll ever think about removing it. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14803373 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14803373
- hd4 9y agoCompanies have been known to be astute and flexible when it comes to spotting opportunities especially when their competitors are making very publicized mistakes. It remains to be seen whether AMD is one of those.
- monocasa 9y agoBeing open source doesn't really matter; it's having access to the keys. And they're never going to give those up because it would break the chain of trust for their DRM.
- phkahler 9y agoI don't want their DRM or their DRMed content. I'll gladly buy a computer for my own uses that don't have those "features".
- craftyguy 9y agoWhy would they care? The folks asking for this are a tiny (tiny) minority of the market.
- snuxoll 9y agoIt's a huge potential win for cloud and government contracts. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and the US Government probably aren't too keen on having ring -3 code running in their datacenters waiting to be exploited somehow.
- microcolonel 9y ago> Microsoft and the US Government probably aren't too keen on having ring -3 code running in their datacenters waiting to be exploited somehow. Which is why they have a special configuration for that, sold to them by Intel.
- Mindless2112 9y agoSource? coreboot was initially developed at LANL, a US Government laboratory. It's worth considering why that might be.
- mschuster91 9y agoGP is referring to Intel's High Assurance Program (http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html) which offered the possibility to disable ME.
- jabl 9y agoSearch for Intel HAP (High Assurance Program). It's a magic killswitch that disables the ME, provided officially only to three-letter agencies and such, of course. As for coreboot, keep in mind that it was originally developed long before the ME was a thing. IIRC the original motivation was that BIOS sucks. Which it does, sure, but that's orthogonal to the ME.
- 9y ago
- monocasa 9y agoThey're not going to. The PSP has a hand in DRM (it runs 'trustlets' in a container), and DRM can only work through obscurity currently.
- kobeya 9y agoAnd DRM is necessary to AMD’s bottom line because...?
- jandrese 9y agoPeople won't buy AMD chips if they can't play Blu-rays or Netflix or use commercial software? It's not a thing today, but it's not hard seeing the world go that way in the future once the legacy BIOS uses are finally aged out.
- kobeya 9y agoBlu-rays and Netflix work just fine on my old laptop that doesn't support secure enclaves. The onus is on us to make sure that a future where we are locked out of the devices we own does not come to pass.
- wolfgke 9y ago> Blu-rays and Netflix work just fine on my old laptop that doesn't support secure enclaves. 4k Bluray requires Kaby Lake or newer (I don't know whether it works on Ryzen or not) and HDMI 2.0a with HDCP 2.2.
- Freak_NL 9y agoWe're not even getting anything over 720p on Linux. 1080p requires Internet Explorer, Edge, or Safari on Windows or MacOS¹. 4k in the webapp requires Edge in addition to the hardware requirements wolfgke lists. 1: https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23742 https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23742
- 9y ago
- ajross 9y agoNot that I disagree, but you realize that point about ME & PSP (which are separate controllers not part of the main boot CPU) isn't particularly relevant to the linked article, which is about removing the 16 bit BIOS boot path from future firmware? By the time you're running real mode IBM PC boot code, the ME & PSP have long since come alive and sorted things out for boot configuration.