3 ms·
A single fake/propaganda account doesn't have much impact, but this was part of a large disinformation campaign; the point of this is to analyze one facet of th
by jimrandomh 9y ago
A single fake/propaganda account doesn't have much impact, but this was part of a large disinformation campaign; the point of this is to analyze one facet of that campaign, to get a sense for how it worked as a whole.
(As for pro-HRC/anti-Trump bots, I haven't seen any, nor have I heard of a foreign state mass-producing them.)
- __s 9y agohttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=Clinton+astroturfing+campaign https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Clinton+astroturfing+campaign https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4fupos/paid_digital_astroturfing_effort_by_correct_the https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4fupos...
- kurthr 9y agoHuh... if those reports are true, they look like they were financed by HRC and not by a FOREIGN government. Do you have an example of the latter? That is the comparable example requested.
- __s 9y agoI do not, should've mentioned these don't disagree with your foreign government point Foreign aide seems masked behind donations to the Clinton Foundation tho: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/07/fact-checking-donations-clinton-foundation http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/07/... Trump's even worse on this front; this is not in any way condoning him. I was more watching this dirt during the DNC primary