3 ms·
Can you link to any evidence suggesting foul play on Kasperskys part? edit: This question was far more reasonable before the parent comment was edited.
by ryanlol 9y ago
Can you link to any evidence suggesting foul play on Kasperskys part?
edit: This question was far more reasonable before the parent comment was edited.
- forapurpose 9y ago[deleted]
- ryanlol 9y agoReally only describes standard AV co practices.
- orf 9y agoI was responding to the comment regarding collision between the Trump campaign and Russia
- ctrl-j 9y agoI mean... it was all over the news? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/technology/kaspersky-lab-israel-russia-hacking.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/technology/kaspersky-lab-...
- ryanlol 9y agoYou could write a very similar article about any AV company. I've personally been automatically scanning data shared by various¹ AV companies for sensitive documents. I only store files not detected as malware by any scanners, and filter out large usually boring files (i.e. videos, audio). I also make an effort to filter out publicly available documents by googling them. So far I've gathered over 20TB of data. So far I've found: Entire customer database of a Swedish bank Thousands of git repositories Hundreds of passport scans Tens of gigabytes of sensitive medical documents Tens of gigabytes of internal government documents Payroll data for hundreds of thousands of people Entire email inboxes, both government and corporate. Hundreds of website dbs in various formats This is just off the top of my head, I could keep going for a while. I've got a searchable archive of tens of millions of clean pdfs, word docs, excel spreadsheets, powerpoints and so on. All pulled from users computers by their AV software. ¹ Not including Kaspersky, but including many US firms.