well I think the article is fishy. especially because of the headline. It says: $400k lost, yeah thats a ton of money, but than it says: "built revenues in his

well I think the article is fishy. especially because of the headline. It says: $400k lost, yeah thats a ton of money, but than it says: "built revenues in his skin care business to more than $10 million annually in seven years" I mean if I have a REVENUE of $10 million annually I would have savings of more than $400k dollar?! Also if the product did not have had a trademark its just fine that somebody could clone the product. what is not so fine are of course fake reviews and other stuff, but thats illegal and every sane person would actually use a lawyer. Also amazon actually suspended his account for infridgement cases and I highly doubt that their system is so bad that it does that automatically. Because that would be more than insane. every story has his two sides and this story looks fishy on both ends.