5 ms·
I'm not sure about either the skepticism or the enthusiasm: we have, throughout history, built cities according to the "modern" standard. From the greek squares
by Heliosmaster 9y ago
I'm not sure about either the skepticism or the enthusiasm: we have, throughout history, built cities according to the "modern" standard. From the greek squares, to medieval towns with only space for a small handcart, to the car-centric cities in the US. And as we go, we improve them based on our knowledge: will we get it "right" this time? Of course not! But that's not the purpose of these projects. Can we try, see what comes out, and adjust as necessary?
Putting all these posts beforehand sounds to me like waterfall development, where cities are naturally built in an "agile" way. See Rome, for example :)
- jpm_sd 9y agoAh, but Rome was not built in a sprint! I think the main point is that fancy IoT gadgetry counts for very little compared to the things that really make a city work: infrastructure for power, water, sanitation, and transportation; places for people to live, not for gadgets to watch them.
- ddalex 9y ago> Rome was not built in a sprint! Now I have to have this T-Shirt to wear to sprint planning meetings.