3 ms·
As I said, vastly different views, to the point of being annoying. We, as a country, are not in the business of "country-building" but rather survival and that
by 200x0 9y ago
As I said, vastly different views, to the point of being annoying.
We, as a country, are not in the business of "country-building" but rather survival and that of avoiding pain. Our government doesn't need talented individuals - they just need brainwashed populace and stability for their power. Thinkers are direct infraction to the system and usually are not tolareted.
Also, what do you expect disarray of talented individuals with no power to concentrate power to do alone in a society that doesn't recognize nor like them?
- fnovd 9y agoSo you solution (highlighted in point 4) is to move to a Western country and become part of the problem?
- 200x0 9y agoOnly way of fixing most of the third-world countries is within Western countries. You don't understand how "problems" work in the third-world, the real problems can't be fixed on-the-ground, most attempts only end up enriching the bloodthirsty puppets of yours and establishing their domain of power even further into the roots of these animal farms. Also, individuals, including me, never signed up to fight unwinnable fight against your tyranny when we were born, so give me a fucking break.
- cardiffspaceman 9y agoI think the "casual game theory" of (4) is, if you want to improve those places, let them have work visas. There are people in certain countries who can be empowered through work visas to pursue their calling (pastors in churches, teaching mathematics in universities, sizing contact lenses of the rich and idle or whatever). Those who choose not to apply for the visas will maybe try something at home, knowing they can get that work visa if what they try doesn't work. And maybe in the trying they will find a different calling than they thought. In succeeding at the things they try at home they might lower the need for work visas.