2 ms·
> It's already well known that the richest of the 1% did not get there purely through a high wage/salary. This talks about the 1%, not the few super rich, whic
by jopsen 9y ago
> It's already well known that the richest of the 1% did not get there purely through a high wage/salary.
This talks about the 1%, not the few super rich, which is less than 1 out of 100.
It's confusing because often when people say "the 1%" they actually mean multi-millionaires; which is less than 1%.
Most 1%'ers are elite professionals. And this articles argues they make more money because of regulation that creates barriers to competition.
The super rich multi-millionaires and billionaires is a different story.
- mcguire 9y agoThe threshold of the top 1% by wealth is $8.4 million in the US. https://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/economix/2012/01/17/measuring-the-top-1-by-wealth-not-income/ https://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/economix/2012/01/17/measuri...