4 ms·
Not being able to donate money to someone that has no way of receiving that money seems sketch, but letting money rest in the account of a third-party that has
by unfunco 9y ago
Not being able to donate money to someone that has no way of receiving that money seems sketch, but letting money rest in the account of a third-party that has no affiliation with the receiver is fine?
- ltc5505 9y agoI believe that they meant YouTube allowing you donate without a receiving account is sketchy compared to Patreon, but their sentence placement/spacing was poor an obfuscated their point.
- joshuamorton 9y agoAs far as I can tell, Brave is doing both. The money rests in a third party account that has no affiliation with the receiver, and they have no way of getting to it until they register. To put it succinctly, I think it's unethical for a platform to accept payment on my behalf without my permission. (whereas yeah, I don't consider holding money in escrow unethical)