3 ms·
Yeah, it'd be unfortunate, but not unprecedented. For example, Debian has both epiphany and epiphany-browser, which are two separate things.
by nigeltao 9y ago
Yeah, it'd be unfortunate, but not unprecedented. For example, Debian has both epiphany and epiphany-browser, which are two separate things.
- nigeltao 9y agoI'm considering a name change: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puffslang/cSrH-s7UqwA/discussion https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puffslang/cSrH-s7UqwA/disc... As for the "We're google, we can pick any name we want" assumption that somebody else wrote earlier, https://github.com/google/puffs https://github.com/google/puffs says "Disclaimer: This is not an official Google product, it is just code that happens to be owned by Google". Also, before the launch, I didn't find many hits for "puffs" when searching github.com projects, or searching "apt search puffs", or searching the Web in general for queries like [puffs programming], or uses of the ".puffs" file extension. It's not like I cackled maniacally as I deliberately screwed over the NetBSD puffs project, whether for myself or on behalf of Google, I just didn't find it. I am bad at searching. Sorry.