3 ms·
Technically it's correct. It's just really odd in tone; it almost sounds like it's unusual or negative that these utilities were not written to be completely cr
by lucideer 9y ago
Technically it's correct. It's just really odd in tone; it almost sounds like it's unusual or negative that these utilities were not written to be completely cross-platform, as if that would be a norm.
- recursive 9y agoBut git is not an example of software that wasn't ported to windows. It was ported to windows.
- lucideer 9y agoYeah, the wording is ambiguous. It could be construed to say Git is an example of a utility that wasn't ported, or just that it was a utility that was written in Linux, for Linux.