6 ms·
I disagree with the OP that managers "ideally" wouldn't be necessary. It's only the stigma of BAD managers that we dislike. A great manager is a LEADER who in
by AmberShah 16y ago
I disagree with the OP that managers "ideally" wouldn't be necessary. It's only the stigma of BAD managers that we dislike. A great manager is a LEADER who inspires and moves everything forward. Without those people we're just a bunch of people working in parallel in a room, hoping it actually connects in some useful way at the end. The person who can draw everyone together for a common purpose and create a synchronous working environment IS the manager (whether you call him that or not).
Let's not confuse the necessary role of a leader with the horrible implementation by so many unqualified and stoopid people.
- lovskogen 16y agoI think it's possible for a group to share a common goal, without a person connecting them. Of course, if people in the group don't share goals - I think it necessary to have someone keeping everyone 'on track'.