You only partially quoted me. I said a "large part of their interference," not all of it as your quote implies. It has been confirmed by the intelligence commu

You only partially quoted me. I said a "large part of their interference," not all of it as your quote implies. It has been confirmed by the intelligence community that a general theme of the interference was that they wanted to ruin Hillary specifically. I suggest you get up to speed on the official findings that have been declassified and released.[1] I also suggest you read up on the Uranium One situation[2] as what you are portraying is very different from what the facts say, and follow a debunked narrative. In fact, in his Wednesday testimony this week, AG Sessions indicated it did not currently merit a special prosecutor due to lack of evidence.[3] If you'd like to continue this debate and making claims, I request that you back them up with credible sources. [1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/the-intelligence-community-report-on-russian-activities-in-the-2016-election/2153/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/the-inte... [2] https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895 https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-ur... [3] http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-essential-washington-updates-in-house-hearing-even-republicans-are-1510678347-htmlstory.html http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-essenti...