3 ms·
>"Please indicate what you did, step by ste-COUNTER" What's the advantage over simply specifying the moment you wanted to react out of the last batch of action
by literallycancer 9y ago
>"Please indicate what you did, step by ste-COUNTER"
What's the advantage over simply specifying the moment you wanted to react out of the last batch of actions (like a normal person)? If the opponent skips too many steps and gives up some critical information as a result -- his problem.
- mattnewton 9y agoBecause that leads to bad feels; did you counter X because you know I have Y in my hand now? I always try to explicitly pass priority after spells even in causal settings when I mean to.
- crankylinuxuser 9y agoIn a way, its an iterated prisoner's dilemma. Sure, I can construct a "infinite beatdown deck" that you lose 99% of the time. And guess what? I'll win. And that next game, they'll say "ditch that deck or you aren't playing". These days, I play explicit decks that have a neat theme and good win conditions (I have 2 decks left). They dont use infinite combos (they win, but are unfun), and I play to have a good time. If I lose, it was because I had some good threats and a blast of a game.