3 ms·
To be clear, the claim was not that 100 megatons themselves would cause climate change, but that 100 firestorms in cities would, and that a 1 Mt bomb would be e
by vilhelm_s 9y ago
To be clear, the claim was not that 100 megatons themselves would cause climate change, but that 100 firestorms in cities would, and that a 1 Mt bomb would be enough to cause a firestorm (there was one in Hiroshima).
It's not completely clear to me just how bad the science was; like the article says there is still a debate today, so it's not completely settled even now. Wikipedia has a lot of discussion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter
- foobarian 9y agoMy problem with these predictions is that volcanic eruptions at these energy scales and with plenty of ash output occur with some frequency, and the effects are still not human extinction.