>If there is a side effect, it might just be that those clamoring for unrestricted internet access force their municipalities (and states) to publicly commoditi

>If there is a side effect, it might just be that those clamoring for unrestricted internet access force their municipalities (and states) to publicly commoditize ISPs. Force them? Here's an example of his ilk pre-empting that: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/another-state-lawmaker-has-proposed-banning-municipal-broadband-networks/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/another-state-la...