3 ms·
I've been using vis as my primary editor for six months, and I'm quite happy with it. (I'm a long time vim user.) Main selling points for me: - Simple editor,
by gwn7 9y ago
I've been using vis as my primary editor for six months, and I'm quite happy with it. (I'm a long time vim user.)
Main selling points for me:
- Simple editor, easy to learn, with a ~650 line man page as the documentation
- Simple, yet has the most useful features from the great vim and sam editors
- No feature bloat - unlike vim
- No vimscript (lua instead)
- Readable and hackable codebase - unlike vim
- Structural regular expressions
For now the unavailable features that I miss the most are tag browsing and code folding. I don't miss them very much in sufficiently clean and modular codebases, but they are indispensable when analyzing large, complex, or badly written code. I switch to vim when that is the case. I should say that their implementation is considered though:
https://github.com/martanne/vis/issues/547 https://github.com/martanne/vis/issues/547
https://github.com/martanne/vis/issues/342 https://github.com/martanne/vis/issues/342
vis is highly recommended to anybody looking for a better vim and appreciate & know how to use vim without a gazillion of plugins.
- wooby 9y agoNot sure if this is what you meant by tag browsing, but I've been using https://github.com/kupospelov/vis-ctags https://github.com/kupospelov/vis-ctags successfully today.
- gwn7 9y agoYes this is exactly what I meant. Thank you for letting me know!
- alphaalpha101 9y ago>For now the unavailable features that I miss the most are tag browsing and code folding. And the unavailable features that I miss the most are another set. And that some other person misses the most is yet another set. Vim doesn't have 'feature bloat'. It has a lot of optional features that you can turn on if you want them and compile out if you don't want them. Big difference.