3 ms·
> to my knowledge there are no legal restrictions on what title a company can give a role From [1]: Becoming licensed gives you the right to use “P.Eng.” after
by Harvey-Specter 9y ago
> to my knowledge there are no legal restrictions on what title a company can give a role
From [1]: Becoming licensed gives you the right to use “P.Eng.” after your name and “engineer” in your job title. Under the Professional Engineers Act, you may only use “engineer” in your job title if you hold a P.Eng. licence.
So yes, I'd agree that companies shouldn't be using engineer in the job title unless they're hiring a P.Eng, but that doesn't absolve the employee of liability.
[1]http://www.peo.on.ca/index.php?ci_id=2075&la_id=1#whypeng http://www.peo.on.ca/index.php?ci_id=2075&la_id=1#whypeng
- kogepathic 9y ago> So yes, I'd agree that companies shouldn't be using engineer in the job title unless they're hiring a P.Eng, but that doesn't absolve the employee of liability. So, would you agree that if we are going to be strict about who can use the term "Engineer" there shouldn't be a double standard allowing companies to call a position "X Engineer" and then hire someone who isn't a P. Eng for the position? If Engineer is a restricted term for individuals, then it should be a restricted term for employers as well. Employers having a position with "Engineer" in the title should only be permitted to hire people with a P.Eng. > Under the Professional Engineers Act, you may only use “engineer” in your job title if you hold a P.Eng. licence. The company sets the job title. So if they want to hire someone who isn't a P.Eng to the role, that person is supposed to tell the company to change the role title to exclude the term "Engineer" ?
- Harvey-Specter 9y agoYes, I thought my agreement was clear in my previous comment. Companies shouldn't be using 'engineer' in the job title unless they're hiring a P.Eng.