4 ms·
Well it's about allocating the cost. Surely the cost of intensification should be paid by those needlessly intensifying. Certainly amongst technology firms the
by neilwilson 9y ago
Well it's about allocating the cost. Surely the cost of intensification should be paid by those needlessly intensifying.
Certainly amongst technology firms there is little need to be in a particular place. That requirement is largely down to a power play and lack of management and organisational skill
- raldi 9y agoI think adding more people to a city is a benefit, not a cost. Most people moving to urban areas do so because they like all the good things that come with high population density. It's only a problem when you artificially restrict the supply of new housing and create a shortage.