4 ms·
That's not surveillance Yes it is. No less than if you got their postal address from their CV, parked outside their house and watched who came and went. After
by gaius 9y ago
That's not surveillance
Yes it is. No less than if you got their postal address from their CV, parked outside their house and watched who came and went. After all they volunteered their details and the street outside their house is public... right?
- Chriky 9y agoI mean, it is clearly "less" isn't it? This continuum fallacy stuff really just makes privacy advocates look like kooks. You have to use the language other people use if you want to convince them, and normal people do not draw an equivalence between someone googling their name, and someone staking out their house, because there is an ocean between them.
- gaius 9y agoThis continuum fallacy stuff really just makes privacy advocates look like kooks You've clearly not read the article, in which a judge says that planting a tracking device on a car is materially different than tailing it.