4 ms·
The government should pay back-salary to anyone with a case dismissed in this manner. This would cause queue back-pressure that would focus the system on high-v
by clord 9y ago
The government should pay back-salary to anyone with a case dismissed in this manner. This would cause queue back-pressure that would focus the system on high-value targets at the front of the queue.
- ekianjo 9y ago> The government should pay back-salary to anyone with a case dismissed in this manner. The "government" is the taxpayers, basically. I'd rather have all folks involved in ruining that man's life being sued like they should, and having to repay him for the opportunity loss. Taxpayers represent an infinite pocket to steal from, but private citizens don't have as much resources and should be held responsible for their decisions.
- noer 9y agoProsecutors, for the most part are immune to civil suits being brought against them.
- ekianjo 9y agoIsn't that something we should fix?
- noer 9y agoI think so, but the Supreme Court didn't in 1976. Frankly, I think there should be a lot more personal liability around careless work when it impacts the health & safety of others. For example, I think police misconduct damages should be paid of out of the police pension funds.
- loeg 9y agoYou're arguing that higher income poeple should get speedier trials than lower income people?
- taneq 9y agoIf jury duty is anything to go on, they'd pay minimum wage regardless of the suspect's income.