We can think of the Internet as a public resource, like the electromagnetic spectrum.[0] The FCC regulates what can use the spectrum, requiring that devices do

We can think of the Internet as a public resource, like the electromagnetic spectrum.[0] The FCC regulates what can use the spectrum, requiring that devices do so safely, in a manner that will not interfere with other devices or cause harm to people or property. The same could (and I think should) be required of devices that connect to the Internet. Frankly, I'm tired of trying to find time to find specs (and then learn how it really works) to figure that out for myself; I secretly dread receiving anything networked for the holidays. It's difficult for me; most end-users have no hope of protecting themselves - and they seem to assume that any product sold must be safe. They assume it is regulated, in effect. [0] Arguably the Internet is physically different than spectrum. Physics 'creates' the spectrum and its physical limitations make it a public good; there are only so many frequencies, and propagation is part of the equation. The Internet is a creation of humans and in theory can be recreated or modified at will. But that theory isn't realistic: The Internet cannot be replaced or substantially modified; the public has no realistic option of using a different Internet if they don't like this one. In any practical sense, it's a public good.