4 ms·
An approach we can take on an individual level is to be mindful of the data we are giving up. If you are employed and in the process of job hunting, then stop
by elhudy 9y ago
An approach we can take on an individual level is to be mindful of the data we are giving up. If you are employed and in the process of job hunting, then stop "liking" the article headlined "10 Reasons why you deserve better from your company".
- wfo 9y agoThis is giving in to surveillance: allowing it to define what you are allowed to say and do. It is also not feasible. Sure, you can stop doing that, but there are millions of other 'tells' that you will give up through your actions online that can predict this information. Machine learning will pick up features you cannot control or even imagine that will accurately predict whether or not you are on the job hunt, no matter what you do to hide it short of just disconnecting from the Internet. Which is likely a tell itself.
- FridgeSeal 9y agoThat's just acquiescing to surveillance. That's not a solution. Surveillance capitalism and government spying on the populace (enabled by the former) has gone far enough, to acquiesce to a degree like that is to give them an inch, and if you give them an inch, they will take a mile and we'll be back to where we started.
- Trav5 9y agoI call BS on the comments that say doing what you suggest is giving up... To me, "Liking" something implies expressing your opinion publicly, probably via Facebook. When I receive a job application, the first thing I do is check to see what the person has publicly posted. That's not surveillance. Before the general population starts to worry about surveillance, they need to think about the public image they are portraying online. I can't hire someone who posts stupid shit publicly. It could damage my business if my clients look them up.
- gaius 9y agoThat's not surveillance Yes it is. No less than if you got their postal address from their CV, parked outside their house and watched who came and went. After all they volunteered their details and the street outside their house is public... right?
- Chriky 9y agoI mean, it is clearly "less" isn't it? This continuum fallacy stuff really just makes privacy advocates look like kooks. You have to use the language other people use if you want to convince them, and normal people do not draw an equivalence between someone googling their name, and someone staking out their house, because there is an ocean between them.
- gaius 9y agoThis continuum fallacy stuff really just makes privacy advocates look like kooks You've clearly not read the article, in which a judge says that planting a tracking device on a car is materially different than tailing it.