3 ms·
I don't understand how you would not call Go as powerful. And it is far from primitive.
by _ph_ 9y ago
I don't understand how you would not call Go as powerful. And it is far from primitive.
- andreasgonewild 9y agoBecause real languages allow creating your own abstractions to fill the gaps, Go doesn't. Witness the total lack of decent error handling and data structures; despite probably thousands of people trying their best from user code. It's the iPhone of programming languages.
- masonicb00m 9y ago“It's the iPhone of programming languages.” Is that supposed to be an insult?
- andreasgonewild 9y agoFor a programming language, I much prefer function over form. Same goes for gadgets, but that's another story.