3 ms·
I disagree. It may not be targeted to an industry, but it is a colossal subsidy that will greatly affect markets in a lot of ways. Plenty can be done to elimin
by moduspol 9y ago
I disagree. It may not be targeted to an industry, but it is a colossal subsidy that will greatly affect markets in a lot of ways.
Plenty can be done to eliminate poverty. I'm confused why you would think large-scale involuntary wealth redistribution is the only way.
- shkkmo 9y ago> it is a colossal subsidy that will greatly affect markets in a lot of ways It is, by definition, not a subsidy since it does not target a subset of economic sectors. > Plenty can be done to eliminate poverty. Name one means of eliminating poverty without wealth re-distribution or subsidies. The only ones I know of involve sterilizing, deporting, killing or otherwise demographically elminating poor people.
- moduspol 9y agoIt will absolutely subsidize the industries most likely to gain from poorer people having more money. The yacht and high-end watch industries will not benefit while housing, auto, and entertainment industries absolutely will. This is basic common sense. Nobody's eliminated poverty yet, so it may be impossible. We do have ways of fighting it, though, which can (and does) include charitable giving (note: voluntary) and economic development of areas.
- NeuNeurosis 9y agoJust to point out this program is not involuntary. All the funds so far as I understand it, have been generated voluntarily.
- moduspol 9y agoRight--sorry. For clarity's sake, I was referring to actual UBI. For these studies (as far as I'm aware), it's voluntarily collected money from outside the area.