3 ms·
I think people in this thread are talking past each other. I wanted to clarify the other side of the debate: Nothing better illustrates the thar mentality bett
by sillysaurus3 9y ago
I think people in this thread are talking past each other. I wanted to clarify the other side of the debate:
Nothing better illustrates the thar mentality better than the fury directed by Islamic militants against Danish and Norwegian cartoons of Mohammed. Sacrilegious art in other cultures can offend and get people angry but the lunatic response of radical Islamists is in a class by itself. It's the shrieking, out of control petulance of a three-year old throwing a tantrum. People infected with this attitude will be utterly incapable of recognizing wrongdoing by their own society, utterly incapable of taking criticism or recognizing the need for correction. This is remarkably close to the image of Hell painted by C. S. Lewis in his books Perelandra and The Screwtape Letters: a paralyzing self-absorption that imprisons the individual in hate and impotent rage while simultaneously blinding him to any possibility of escape.
This doesn't seem like a question of legal systems.
- blackbagboys 9y agoThis seems like an utterly dissimilar phenomenon from the personal, tit for tat honor disputes between people who know each on an individual basis and are enmeshed in the same social network or framework
- ben_w 9y ago> I think people in this thread are talking past each other. I am also getting this impression. I think that while I am talking about libel and slander, vkou is talking about the need to be taken seriously?