the cost to insure people in that 7% is substantially higher than the 49% receiving coverage through their employers. That's for a variety of factors including

the cost to insure people in that 7% is substantially higher than the 49% receiving coverage through their employers. That's for a variety of factors including them being statistically unhealthier (unemployed people tend to be sicker) From where do you draw the conclusion that the 7% individual market customers (if not 7% + 9% uninsured) are unemployed?