MORE of these headlines instead of "Go is slower than Rust" or "Rust has more bells and whistles than Go". I develop in both Go and Rust. I use Go as main rep

MORE of these headlines instead of "Go is slower than Rust" or "Rust has more bells and whistles than Go". I develop in both Go and Rust. I use Go as main replacement for .NET/Java web tier...no need for install specific Java or .NET run-time library. I use Rust when there's heavy disk reads and writes...and I know it's a nightly job which should never segfault and never finish the execution since it crashed. GO = useful for rapid prototyping and a good .NET/JAVA middle-tier replacement. RUST = you CARE about performance. You can use both with FFI/C - use Go as the carrier and use RUST where the functions should squeeze every bit of performance to do something...