3 ms·
in what case is this specificness necessary? I can think of trials or police reports, but I imagine in that case one would have to use the actual words, lest co
by riffraff 9y ago
in what case is this specificness necessary?
I can think of trials or police reports, but I imagine in that case one would have to use the actual words, lest confusion ensues.
Forgive me if I sound argumentative, I'm genuinely interested and trying to understand.
- roel_v 9y agoIt's a style figure; i.e. a choice an author makes, in order to convey their intent most clearly. It's artistic freedom to choose whether or not to use it. I don't see what purpose your insistence on delineated rules on when to use what words serves. I for one found the article more authentic in the way it was written, vs if they would have used 'racial slurs' or another generic term.
- PhasmaFelis 9y agoSaying something like "racial slurs" could potentially leave one wondering if this was something relatively mild, possibly even a mere misunderstanding that was blown out of proportion. Mentioning that someone dropped an n-bomb leaves no room for uncertainty. It's like "sexual harassment." That phrase alone will have some people thinking "oh, the poor guy just said she looked nice today and she flipped out." If you say "he stuck his hand up her dress and told her to be at his apartment at 9pm," there's no space for that sort of misunderstanding.