3 ms·
shame it cost us 120 million effing bucks to do something they should have effing known was a forgone conclusion and the only human effing decision to make. wh
by senectus1 9y ago
shame it cost us 120 million effing bucks to do something they should have effing known was a forgone conclusion and the only human effing decision to make.
what a waste of money. bunch of 1st class political wankers they are... the whole lot of them.
- Paraesthetic 9y ago'Human decision' lol yes saying those who can't push forward their genetic line is acceptable is totally a human decision.
- flukus 9y agoDo you think some sort of fertility test should be conducted before people are allowed to marry?
- BLKNSLVR 9y agoWhat has marriage to do with pushing forward genetic lines? Are you trying to strawman, or did the strawman just work on you?
- benjohnson 9y agoTo answer your question: historically, the primary benefit to marriage was to ensure a stable household for the raising of children and for the economic wellbeing of the resulting family. It was often a pragmatic arrangement instead of a romantic one. Now days marriage for some has become a declaration of longer-term romantic love.
- BLKNSLVR 9y agoAnd they tout themselves as the responsible economic party. And many people believe it. Sigh.
- dwd 9y agoYes, pretty sure we could have got a half decent reusable citizen's voting app using the logistical costs of the survey. I'm assuming most of the cost was advertising and marketing.