4 ms·
Then there's several distinct schools of thought on microdosing. Read the link I posted above.
by tsomctl 9y ago
Then there's several distinct schools of thought on microdosing. Read the link I posted above.
- tree_of_item 9y agoThe image in your link uses the term "sub-perceptual dose". How is that congruent with feeling a "buzz"? A sub-perceptual dose by definition is too weak to feel a buzz. If you could feel a buzz, it would be in your perception.
- tree_of_item 9y agoAlso from the comments on your link: > DevO on October 15, 2017 at 12:31 am > Niels, Micro-dosing is taking amounts too small to be psychoactive, but at the same time the substance still has effects that are beneficial in many different ways for different folks. Here's a quote from from James Fadiman, the person who came up with the whole idea of microdosing in the first place: (at https://sites.google.com/view/microdosingpsychedelics/faq-on-microdosing?authuser=0 https://sites.google.com/view/microdosingpsychedelics/faq-on...) > A dose that feels as if you are right at the edge of a psychedelic experience is too high. As far as I can tell, there is one school of microdosing, and you're not in it. I wish you were right, because the whole idea of "sub-perceptual" doses is obviously bullshit, but I'm not seeing it.