5 ms·

Erlang is amazing language in its simplicity. And it was the perfect language for the web. I keep wondering why it never really took off.

qaq 9y ago
People are creatures of habit the syntax looks "weird" to many.
- pjmlp 9y ago
  To the point of rewriting syntax just because of it, e.g. ReasonML vs OCaml...
notamy 9y ago
Syntax as well as just that it's a really weird way of thinking about things compared to languages like Java, Python, etc. Elixir seems to be helping some with this, so I guess we'll see.
- noncoml 9y ago
  Yeah, syntax is a bit different than the mainstream, but it only takes a week or so to get used to it.
- digitalzombie 9y ago
  It's Prolog inspired. It's weird because it never took off like C/C++ like languages. The language syntax is small enough that I believe it'll take a short time to learn and get use to the syntax versus other languages.
  - kornish 9y ago
    > The language syntax is small enough that I believe it'll take a short time to learn and get use to the syntax versus other languages. I'm not sure size of syntax has all that much to do with adoption. Case in point: Lisp.
- noncoml 9y ago
  It’s funny because I would take Erlang’s syntax over Elixir’s anyday.
  - im_down_w_otp 9y ago
    Likewise. I wish I could have Erlang the language w/ Elixir's community and growth.
    - skrebbel 9y ago
      Can't you? I mean, aren't they interoperable?
      - saurik 9y ago
        The canonical argument order in Elixir is backwards from Erlang (and I will argue just "wrong" with respect to the functional programming paradigm: it is essentially object-oriented corruption... the subject pretty much needs to be the final argument for various forms of functional composition to work; the place where this really becomes clear is when trying to call "reduce", which continues to have the "correct" argument ordering even while almost nothing else does <- though watch me be misremembering the exact place where this clicks as it hasn't been years since I spent a lot of time trying to be happy programming with Elixir :/), so there is a massive impedance mismatch tying to reuse functions and primitives codes in one language from the other (and it almost seems like many Elixir wrappers exist only to reverse the argument order). So, sure: they are "interoperable"... but so are C and Python ;P.
        filmor 9y ago
        Erlang does not support currying, so having the subject in the last arg does not help much. Also, the actual ordering is not `func(Args..., Subject)` but instead `func(Args..., Subject, OptionalArgs...)` which bit me more than once. I like Elixir's consistent use of the first arg for the subject along with the pipe operator, which gives you essentially currying-like behaviour in the first argument.
      - deleted 9y ago
- tazjin 9y ago
  > it's a really weird way of thinking about things compared to languages like Java, Python This depends on your background. I have a very hard time thinking about procedural behaviour and state mutations, Erlang's (and other functional language's) model is much easier to keep in my head.
issaria 9y ago
For network applications, yes. Web? no. It actually shares a lot of the usecase with golang, I would say, if the program can be distributed as binary, there would probably no golang.
- noncoml 9y ago
  > For network applications, yes. Web? no. Meaning?

qaq 9y ago

People are creatures of habit the syntax looks "weird" to many.

pjmlp 9y ago
To the point of rewriting syntax just because of it, e.g. ReasonML vs OCaml...

notamy 9y ago

Syntax as well as just that it's a really weird way of thinking about things compared to languages like Java, Python, etc. Elixir seems to be helping some with this, so I guess we'll see.

noncoml 9y ago
Yeah, syntax is a bit different than the mainstream, but it only takes a week or so to get used to it.
digitalzombie 9y ago
It's Prolog inspired. It's weird because it never took off like C/C++ like languages. The language syntax is small enough that I believe it'll take a short time to learn and get use to the syntax versus other languages.
- kornish 9y ago
  > The language syntax is small enough that I believe it'll take a short time to learn and get use to the syntax versus other languages. I'm not sure size of syntax has all that much to do with adoption. Case in point: Lisp.
noncoml 9y ago
It’s funny because I would take Erlang’s syntax over Elixir’s anyday.
- im_down_w_otp 9y ago
  Likewise. I wish I could have Erlang the language w/ Elixir's community and growth.
  - skrebbel 9y ago
    Can't you? I mean, aren't they interoperable?
    - saurik 9y ago
      The canonical argument order in Elixir is backwards from Erlang (and I will argue just "wrong" with respect to the functional programming paradigm: it is essentially object-oriented corruption... the subject pretty much needs to be the final argument for various forms of functional composition to work; the place where this really becomes clear is when trying to call "reduce", which continues to have the "correct" argument ordering even while almost nothing else does <- though watch me be misremembering the exact place where this clicks as it hasn't been years since I spent a lot of time trying to be happy programming with Elixir :/), so there is a massive impedance mismatch tying to reuse functions and primitives codes in one language from the other (and it almost seems like many Elixir wrappers exist only to reverse the argument order). So, sure: they are "interoperable"... but so are C and Python ;P.
      - filmor 9y ago
        Erlang does not support currying, so having the subject in the last arg does not help much. Also, the actual ordering is not `func(Args..., Subject)` but instead `func(Args..., Subject, OptionalArgs...)` which bit me more than once. I like Elixir's consistent use of the first arg for the subject along with the pipe operator, which gives you essentially currying-like behaviour in the first argument.
    - deleted 9y ago
tazjin 9y ago
> it's a really weird way of thinking about things compared to languages like Java, Python This depends on your background. I have a very hard time thinking about procedural behaviour and state mutations, Erlang's (and other functional language's) model is much easier to keep in my head.

issaria 9y ago

For network applications, yes. Web? no. It actually shares a lot of the usecase with golang, I would say, if the program can be distributed as binary, there would probably no golang.

noncoml 9y ago
> For network applications, yes. Web? no. Meaning?