4 ms·
Its all about the perception. I've been running Arch on testing repos and with the linux-mainline kernel for years now and haven't experienced any major breaka
by chmln 9y ago
Its all about the perception.
I've been running Arch on testing repos and with the linux-mainline kernel for years now and haven't experienced any major breakage at all.
I believe its down to the reputation of Arch Linux - people perceive it as a "bleeding-edge" and "breaking" OS and thus every even minor problem they experience is attributed to the OS and this perception is reinforced.
The same people might be scourging for hours on ubuntuforums because Ubuntu filled up their /boot partition with obsolete kernels and won't boot anymore. But its still perceived as "stable".
- styfle 9y ago> The same people might be scourging for hours on ubuntuforums because Ubuntu filled up their /boot partition with obsolete kernels and won't boot anymore. But its still perceived as "stable". This is totally unacceptable. I started using ubuntu in production thinking it was "stable". After 6 months, the server wouldn't boot because of this reason. I don't think I ever manually installed updates. It just updated itself and broke itself.
- JdeBP 9y agoYou might want to read what Dustin Kirkland wrote here on Hacker News about this about half a year ago. * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14026353 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14026353 * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14027489 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14027489