2 ms·
> A stronger Mozilla (financially speaking) is good for privacy and free software. While I understand exactly what you mean, surely there's a point at which ac
by JadeNB 9y ago
> A stronger Mozilla (financially speaking) is good for privacy and free software.
While I understand exactly what you mean, surely there's a point at which accepting money from privacy-violating organisations (and bundling a privacy-violating extension, and who knows what else is coming?) means that Mozilla is no longer good for privacy?
- neuland 9y agoDefinitely true. It's a balancing act. Granted, that means that some people are going to think you're compromising too much on your ideals (or to little).