4 ms·
The OP addresses that concern with a link to https://www2.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/cf-toplas04.pdf https://www2.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/cf-toplas04.pdf
by goialoq 9y ago
The OP addresses that concern with a link to https://www2.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/cf-toplas04.pdf https://www2.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/cf-toplas04.pdf
- btilly 9y agoThat is a different concern. That paper is about implementing security models based on what is supposed to be in the stack. My concern is about emitting a debugging stack backtrace on error. If you are concerned with a security model, it is nice to know that you can remove the stack and prove that the security model is satisfied. But you can't provide a programmer with a record of stack frames that you do not have.