Not really; it's actually one of the biggest ones. There are several categories of sites which fail due to reliance on JavaScript: - Sites which should work p

Not really; it's actually one of the biggest ones. There are several categories of sites which fail due to reliance on JavaScript: - Sites which should work perfectly but don't work at all (e.g. Blogger). These are so annoying because serving text & images is exactly what the web is good at, and requiring JavaScript to do it is just abusive and borderline evil. - Sites which work perfectly fine, except that all the images are blurry, low-res placeholders. These are so annoying because they're actually serving images. Their developers know how to do the right thing, but obstinately refuse to do so. - Sites where small things don't work. They are annoying, but at least one can read them. Ars Technica gets a special mention for the fact that its articles are perfectly readable but the comments are not. I chalk this up to incompetence and laziness. - Single page apps which really need to be single-page apps. They're annoying because they would almost certainly be better as native apps, but they really are doing something that the static web can't do.