4 ms·
they make it very hard to separate science from marketing Isn't this true for pretty much any science done ever? It only becomes a problem when marketing is go
by p1esk 9y ago
they make it very hard to separate science from marketing
Isn't this true for pretty much any science done ever? It only becomes a problem when marketing is good, and science is not.
so it's theory more in the sense of a hypothesis rather than what is meant by "theory" in math or physics
Again, isn't it true for pretty much any neuroscience research? How would you judge a neuroscience paper importance?
Also, going back to your earlier answer: what would convince you that a program displays the learning and reasoning abilities of some advanced invertebrates?
- pron 9y ago> Isn't this true for pretty much any science done ever? Maybe, but when it comes to a commercial entity I'm more suspicious. > How would you judge a neuroscience paper importance? I wouldn't; I'd let a neuroscientist judge. It's just that I believe most of us would hear of a major breakthrough in neuroscience. > what would convince you that a program displays the learning and reasoning abilities of some advanced invertebrates? It's hard to say precisely (largely because we don't know what intelligence is, let alone have a good quantitative measure for it), but if you read about insect behavior it's very clear that we're nowhere near that (just as it's clear people are more intelligent than spiders even though there are probably mental tasks that spiders can perform better/faster than humans). So ask me again when the question becomes harder to answer :)